It Is Not Seeing the Hazard: A Frozen Vision-Language Safety Score Measures Its Caption Bank

Frozen vision–language models increasingly provide safety signals for reinforce- ment learning. Their use assumes that similarity to language describing danger indicates the hazard itself. Yet policy return and collision rate cannot reveal whether a score detects hazards or responds to correlated features of the scene. VLM-based methods have reported gains in driving and safe-RL benchmarks by converting image–text similarity into rewards, costs, or confidence weights. Such signals promise to reduce reliance on manually designed feedback. They may also reflect prompt structure, embedding geometry, or camera viewpoint, leav- ing their safety meaning unverified. To address this gap, we present a controlled evaluation of a frozen CLIP prompt-margin safety score. We apply the score to trajectories generated by policies that never receive it, match pre-contact observa- tions to contact-free observations with comparable hazard geometry, and vary the captions, encoder, and camera view. Across three policies, 180 episodes, and 130 isolated contact onsets, the score decreases for about twenty steps before contact. Mechanism controls indicate that the score mainly tracks resemblance to the scene shared by its captions and changes with caption separation and camera view. A constant-confidence control retains the lower catastrophe-rate point estimate, so policy gains do not establish hazard perception.