acceptodds
Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2027

Auditing Individual Specificity in EEG Foundation Models with Occupancy-Preserving Temporal Nulls

Abstract

EEG foundation models are typically evaluated through downstream predictive performance, providing limited insight into what individual-specific information their frozen representations preserve when transferred to an unseen dataset. In this study, we introduce a representation-audit framework that distinguishes fingerprintability from temporal fingerprintability. A temporal representation supports an individual-specific dynamical interpretation only if its cross-session fingerprintability exceeds an occupancy-preserving temporal null. We formalize this distinction through temporal excess, . On the Temple University Epilepsy Corpus (TUEP), we evaluate two independently pretrained frozen EEG encoders, CNN–Transformer and LUNA-Base, and discretize their latent representations into states. State occupancy is reproducible across separate recording sessions (), with for CNN–Transformer and for LUNA-Base. Empirical lag-1 transition representations also appear individually specific under conventional metrics, reaching Top-1 retrieval rates of and , respectively, compared with chance. In contrast, the apparent temporal fingerprintability does not exceed the occupancy-preserving temporal null: for CNN–Transformer (real vs. shuffled : vs. ) and for LUNA-Base ( vs. ). Residual-transition and state-persistence probes yield the same conclusion at the primary resolution. These results show that a temporal representation can be individually fingerprintable without its fingerprintability depending on temporal order. More generally, does not imply , motivating occupancy-preserving temporal nulls when interpreting individual-specific dynamics in learned representations.

Then back it, or bet against it.

Related papers

Open the market on this paper to see 7 more related papers.