When Successful Strategies Fail: Adaptation to Environmental Novelty in Terminal Agents

LLM agents increasingly solve long-horizon tasks by autonomously interacting with their environment. In doing so, their strategies rely on assumptions about that environment: which resources and tools exist, where they are located, and how they behave. When these assumptions no longer hold, reliable agents must detect the change and adapt while pursuing the same goal. We study this *adaptation capability* through *environmental novelty*: a change that keeps the task objective fixed while invalidating an assumption underlying an otherwise successful trajectory. We introduce AGNI, an automated pipeline that extracts trajectory-relevant assumptions, injects targeted environmental changes, and validates that the resulting novel tasks remain solvable. Across three terminal benchmarks, AGNI produces diverse novelties spanning resources, interfaces, constraints, and execution semantics. Evaluating multiple LLM agents reveals a substantial adaptation gap between base and novel tasks. Trajectory analysis suggests that agents often encounter evidence of the change but fail to localize its cause, revise their strategy, or verify recovery. Finally, post-training on environmental novelty improves adaptation on held-out novel tasks while also improving performance on base tasks. Our results highlight a gap between task competence and adaptive capability and motivate environmental variation as a core dimension of agent training and evaluation.