acceptodds
Published as a conference paper at NeurIPS 2026

When evolution cheats: Frozen-weights Baselines reveal static-solvers interference in evolved plastic spiking neural networks

Denis Larsen, Kazi Shah Nawaz Ripon, Anis Yazidi, Gustavo B Moreno e Mello

Abstract

In artificial systems, neuroevolution with synaptic plasticity promises agents that adapt during their lifetime, yet standard fitness evaluations do not distinguish inherited static competence from within-lifetime adaptation. Evolutionary algorithms can produce static solvers: genomes whose inherited topology performs well even when synaptic plasticity is disabled and weights remain at their lifetime initialization, confounding adaptation with evolved structure. To expose this confound, we introduce a two-phase evaluation protocol with an explicit static-solver extinction mechanism that measures each genome both with plasticity disabled (frozen-weight) and enabled (plastic-weight) on the same task. The first phase quantifies the static competence of the inherited network structure, while the second adds online learning through spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). The extinction mechanism removes static solvers from the gene pool, i.e., any genome whose frozen-weight fitness exceeds a threshold, thereby exerting evolutionary pressure for learning and against static solving. We combine this protocol with a complete factorial design that independently toggles extinction pressure and within-lifetime learning. The method is instantiated on a mutable cart-pole benchmark using NEAT-evolved spiking networks with inherited topology and per-connection STDP parameters, while synaptic weights are reinitialized each lifetime and STDP updates run continuously at inference time during evaluation. Across replicates per condition, the protocol reveals a clear static-solver fingerprint: plasticity-free neuroevolution reaches high training fitness but suffers a roughly -point train–test gap on held-out pole lengths. Learning-enabled agents reduce this gap to about points and achieve the highest held-out AUC. Extinction does not improve mean test performance when learning is available; instead, it reduces replicate variance and strengthens attribution by preventing high-fitness frozen-weight genomes from dominating selection. These results position extinction not as a generic performance booster, but as a diagnostic intervention for disentangling inherited structure from genuine within-lifetime adaptation.

Related papers

See more related submissions when the market opens.