Where Do Long Captions Fail? Position-Aware Diagnosis and Reinforcement Learning for Detailed Image Captioning

Detailed image captioning is usually framed as an amount problem: a model should mention more visual facts while avoiding hallucination. We argue that this framing hides a basic structure of long-form captioning: a caption is an ordered sequence, and different failures appear at different positions. We introduce a position-aware rubric representation that decomposes dense human references into atomic visual claims, verifies generated captions against those claims, and induces a quartile-wise composition of supported, hallucinated, and generic content. This lens reveals two qualitatively different failures in long captions: models tend to produce unsupported specificity in the middle, while the final portion often escapes into vague, non-evidential language rather than simply accumulating more hallucination. Dense human references do not exhibit the same position-dependent pattern under the identical pipeline, suggesting that the effect is a model behavior rather than an artifact of long descriptive text. Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose *PAGER* (**P**osition-**A**ware **G**rounded **E**vidence **R**einforcement), a GRPO training objective with separate signals for supported fine-grained middle evidence, evidence-bearing tail continuation, claim coverage, and content-aware length control. The result is a closed loop: the same ordered claim representation identifies where long captions fail and supplies the position-specific reward needed to repair those failures. Experiments on detailed-caption benchmarks show that PAGER improves position-wise grounding and pairwise caption preference while preserving competitive global caption quality.