RepProbe: Can Video Language Models Count Repeated Actions? A Diagnostic Benchmark

Repetition counting requires identifying and enumerating action cycles over time. While state-of-the-art video language models describe actions fluently, they fail to reliably count how many times an action repeats. To investigate this limitation, we introduce RepProbe, a benchmark of 42K real and synthetic video clips containing exactly k in [1, 20] complete repetitions, with controls for clip position, temporal coverage, and duration. These controls allow us to study the counting failure directly and locate where in the model it arises. Counting accuracy collapses at high counts across the video language models we evaluate, and controlled experiments show this collapse is not explained by frame sampling alone. We compare model outputs with linear probes trained on the final-layer representations used to generate those outputs. We find a consistent representation-to-output dissociation: substantial count information remains linearly decodable even when models fail to report the correct count. Further analysis shows this failure arises primarily at the output stage, where answers concentrate on a small set of preferred numbers rather than the available count information. The dissociation holds on both real and synthetic videos and is not explained by clip duration, position, or scene content. These results indicate that models encode repetition structure but do not reliably report it in their outputs.