CHARTER: Auditing Reference Substitution in Hierarchical Compact-Evidence Evaluation for Computational Pathology

In digital pathology, compact evidence is often used to explain or audit predictions made by whole-slide image multiple instance learning models. In hierarchical compact-evidence pipelines, candidate filtering introduces a strategy-specific candidate-conditioned prediction alongside the original full-bag prediction. If the evaluation reference changes while the intended target remains the original full-bag prediction, however, not only can the measured fidelity of the same compact evidence change, but comparisons between competing candidate strategies can also change. To make this dependence explicit, we introduce CHARTER, a reference-aware evaluation charter that asks researchers to **DECLARE** the intended target and reference, **QUANTIFY** candidate-induced prediction shift, and **AUDIT** the stability of comparative conclusions. Across the 15 comparisons in our main five-seed Random-$K$ audit, 4 showed determinate reversals; in a matched native-ranking stress test, the ACMIL comparison changed from REVERSED to PRESERVED. CHARTER turns otherwise implicit candidate-filtering and reference choices into an auditable evaluation specification, helping distinguish genuine preservation of the intended prediction from apparent gains induced by changing the prediction being explained.