Known-Subspace Rate Ladder for Streaming Low-Rank Regression with Fast Coefficient Drift
Abstract
We study streaming low-rank regression when the relevant subspace is fixed but its coefficients can change abruptly. This setting exposes a plasticity–stability tradeoff: decaying steps learn stationary segments well but recover slowly after jumps, while constant steps react quickly but retain a noise floor. We prove a known-subspace rate ladder for expected dynamic regret under the same linear-Gaussian sample feedback. Monotone decaying-step stochastic gradient suffers linear regret under coefficient jumps, whereas a clipped fixed-window estimator achieves regret when the number of jumps grows as . An adaptive estimator that combines generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) change-point detection with clipped least squares achieves on a well-spaced class with jumps, and a van Trees argument gives a matching lower bound on the same class. Charging each change by its own size, the ratio of the two bounds depends only on the condition number and the signal-to-noise ratio, uniformly in the minimum jump size, whereas a size-independent charge grows as the squared amplitude-to-jump ratio and is linear in for the smallest jumps the spacing admits. When the subspace is fixed but unknown, running the same detector on half of the samples projected onto a spectral-moment estimate built from the other half keeps the rate at an additive cost of order for learning the subspace when , and a matching lower bound shows that this cost is necessary up to the factor when ; a blockwise Fantope extension covers moving subspaces at the scale. In synthetic experiments, a fixed window cuts the regret of a theorem-class decaying-step learner -fold at ; the analyzed GLR rule, run exactly on equally spaced jumps of size at least with isotropic Gaussian covariates at high signal-to-noise ratio, grows at close to the oracle's rate and has lower regret at than every tuned baseline; and a suffix-retaining GLR variant has – lower regret than the preregistered tuned competitor with the lowest tuning regret at on equally and unequally spaced change paths with mixed jump sizes, three covariate designs and noise levels –.
Then back it, or bet against it.
Related papers
Open the market on this paper to see 7 more related papers.