acceptodds
Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2027

Brain alignment of reasoning and action representations from vision–language and action models during naturalistic gameplay

Abstract

Understanding how humans and artificial intelligence systems predict and plan by interacting with their environment is a fundamental challenge at the intersection of neuroscience and machine learning. Most brain-encoding studies focus on aligning artificial models with brain activity during language comprehension or passive visual processing, while interactive brain-alignment studies have to date been largely limited to reinforcement-learning (RL) agents and theory-based models. To address this gap, we study brain alignment of representative models from two foundation-model types, namely vision-language models (VLMs) and large-action models (LAMs), using fMRI recordings from participants playing naturalistic Atari-style video games. Specifically, we examine how action-focused and reasoning-focused prompts shape the model's internal representations and their alignment with fMRI brain activity. First, we find that both VLMs and LAMs achieve significantly higher voxel-wise encoding performance than RL baselines, with the advantage holding even under matched feature dimensionality. Second, compared to a “no-prompt” baseline, prompt-driven gains are larger in higher-order frontal-parietal and motor-planning regions than in early visual cortex, roughly – when averaged over ROI groups, although individual regions are heterogeneous. Third, variance partitioning reveals a qualitatively different representational organization. VLM representations are prompt-symmetric (12.5% unique action vs. 13.6% unique reasoning), whereas LAM is action-dominant (27% unique action vs.% unique reasoning), with the asymmetry strongest in frontal-motor cortex. Together, these results demonstrate that action-specialized fine-tuning reorganizes multimodal game-state representations in ways that change their alignment with action-associated cortical regions, a difference that is invisible at the level of raw prediction accuracy.

Then back it, or bet against it.

Related papers

Open the market on this paper to see 7 more related papers.