PRESERVE WHAT MATTERS: COUNTERFACTUAL TASK-VECTOR DECOMPOSITION FOR REPLAY-FREE CONTINUAL VISION-LANGUAGE-ACTION LEARNING
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated strong capabilities in language-conditioned robotic manipulation. Yet operating in open-ended environ- ments requires continual acquisition of new skills, which can severely overwrite previously learned behaviors and lead to catastrophic forgetting. Existing replay- based methods mitigate forgetting by revisiting stored demonstrations, incurring persistent storage and repeated training costs, while replay-free approaches typi- cally preserve prior capabilities through allocating additional task-specific mod- ules, leading to growing model capacity as new skills accumulate. Inspired by task arithmetic, we view the parameter change induced by downstream fine- tuning as a proxy for newly acquired capability. This recasts implicit skill re- tention as explicit parameter-space protection, avoiding both historical demon- stration replay and task-specific model expansion. Building on this view, we fur- ther identify that not every direction in a historical task vector deserves equal preservation: transferable task functionality can be entangled with environment- specific correlations, so indiscriminately protecting the full update may unnec- essarily restrict future adaptation. We therefore introduce CSD-VLA, a replay- free framework that uses task-preserving counterfactual interventions to identify an environment-sensitive subspace, decomposes each historical task vector into environment-sensitive and counterfactually invariant components, and selectively protects only the latter. Experiments on OpenVLA-OFT-7B and QwenOFT-3B across LIBERO and RoboTwin 2.0 demonstrate that CSD-VLA outperforms rep- resentative replay-based and replay-free baselines in overall continual-learning performance, strengthens retention under both task-level and cross-capability shifts, and better preserves historical skills under unseen visual changes, without replaying historical demonstrations or expanding the policy architecture.
Then back it, or bet against it.
Related papers
Open the market on this paper to see 7 more related papers.