HyperTransfer: Understanding the Equivalence between Base Optimizer and Hyperball

Hyperball optimizers constrain parameter norms and update only their directions, establishing a distinct paradigm for neural network optimization. Although this geometry appears fundamentally different from that of conventional Base Optimizers, which update both parameter norms and directions, we show that the two paradigms are dynamically equivalent for scale-invariant networks. Building on this equivalence, we propose HyperTransfer, which constructs a Hyperball optimizer that reproduces the dynamics of a target Base Optimizer using only its initialization and learning-rate schedule, without running the target optimizer itself. We further derive the inverse mapping and extend the framework to non-scale-invariant networks. Experiments show that both HyperTransfer and the inverse mapping produce loss trajectories nearly identical to those of their targets, suggesting that Hyperball dynamics are governed primarily by the induced effective learning-rate schedule and optimizer state. Finally, we observe that matching nominal learning-rate decay ratios can yield different effective learning-rate decay ratios in Base and Hyperball optimizers, highlighting the need to account for this discrepancy when designing fair optimizer comparisons.