Toward Convincing Biology with Language: Offline Learning of Prompt-Conditioned Interventions for Cells, Organoids, and Biobots
Abstract
Artificial intelligence increasingly serves as a natural-language interface to complex technical systems, letting people accomplish sophisticated tasks by describing what they want rather than specifying how to do it. Extending this interface to living systems is harder: unlike code or images, a biological intervention has no closed-form linguistic meaning, and the paired language-intervention-outcome data needed to learn such a mapping is expensive to collect, since each example requires its own wet-lab experiment. One way around this is to treat an existing archive of interventions and their already-observed outcomes as a fixed, offline dataset, and use a vision-language model to judge, without any new experiments, whether an archived outcome matches a natural-language description. But whether that judgment is reliable enough to train a language-to-intervention mapping on – without new experiments and without human validation – has remained unclear. Here we show that a natural-language interface for a living organism – a xenobot, a synthetic multicellular construct with no nervous system – can be learned entirely offline this way, using a vision-language model's own judgment as the sole training reward: an instruction is mapped to the intervention already on record as producing the described behavior. This mapping generalizes to entirely new instructions, evaluated against archive data withheld from training ($80.0% held-out accuracy vs.a 66.7% chance baseline, matching a network trained directly on ground-truth labels). These results indicate that offline archives, combined with automated judgment, can substitute for costly new experiments when learning to ground natural language in a living system's own recorded behavior - an intermediate step toward directing living matter with the same ease as code, ahead of testing whether these predicted interventions reproduce their intended behavior on live, newly-stimulated cells and, ultimately, convincing biology with language alone.
Then back it, or bet against it.
Related papers
Open the market on this paper to see 7 more related papers.