acceptodds
Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2027

Trust the Critic More

Abstract

Standard language model RL algorithms credit every token of a long rollout with the same advantage determined by the terminal reward. Actor–critic methods can provide finer-grained credit assignment, but learned critics are generally considered too inaccurate to trust for RL for LLMs. In recent works, even when a critic is present, it is used only for baseline estimation, so every trajectory must be rolled out to its terminal reward (Venkatraman et al., 2026; Pan et al., 2026). We introduce Actor-Critic with Action Chunking (AC2) that removes the need to roll every trajectory to completion. AC2 instead assigns credit to action chunks: short continuations of prefixes of past trajectories. A learned critic scores the state reached at the end of each action chunk, allowing the policy to update without observing a terminal reward. We make critic-based credit assignment reliable through three design choices. First, we introduce local readiness, which uses critic-based updates on a problem only when the critic is sufficiently accurate on that particular problem. Second, when available, we provide the critic with a reference solution from a previous successful rollout. Third, we assign credit over action chunks of 10k tokens rather than individual tokens, giving the critic a more meaningful amount of work to evaluate. We train Qwen3-4B on FineProofs-RL using AC2 and evaluate on IMO-ProofBench. AC2 exceeds GRPO's peak validation score of using fewer decoding FLOPs. This gain comes from two sources: (1) AC2 requires fewer training steps to reach this score, and (2) each step generates fewer tokens because the policy does not need to continue every trajectory to completion. Conceptually, we demonstrate that we can remove the need to roll out every trajectory to completion, opening up a large previously unexplored design space for LLM RL algorithms.

open until 14 Dec 2026

est. 32% chance this paper gets accepted at ICLR 2027.

Reject 68%Accept 32%

What do you think this paper will get?

All positions stay anonymous.

Related papers

Loading the map…

Discussion (0)

Sign in to comment.