acceptodds
Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2027

LoomKV: Structured Low-Rank KV Caches for Video LLMs

Abstract

Among the most accurate ways to compress a video language model’s KV cache, a low-rank factorization shared across a group of layers must first hold the very cache it compresses. We compute it per input during prefill, keeping a fixed-rank representation rather than a fixed fraction of tokens. Which structure to keep is itself a result: a matched-storage control rejected our first, grid-preserving Tucker design in favour of sharing across layers (47.97 against 59.12), and the grid does not pay for itself after that extraction either. The offline cross-layer factorization, however, consumes the completed prompt cache, which is exactly what cannot be held. LoomKV removes that dependence. As visual blocks arrive it maintains compact coefficients, a shared channel basis and the Gram matrix needed to refresh that basis, and a refresh from r + Sb rows is exact for the whole history the state represents, so the dense multi-layer cache is never materialized. On a 24 GB card the offline factorization fails at 128 frames and a chunked dense control at 160; LoomKV completes 224, per-session resident state is 5.7 to 7.7× smaller, and nine prefilled sessions stay resident against one. At a matched answer-time cache it outperforms InfiniPot-V by 7.46 points on Qwen2-VL and 13.56 on Qwen2.5-VL on MME-VideoOCR, stays within 3.6 points of the offline ceiling across three model families, and on long Video-MME is indistinguishable from dense while retaining 11.9% of the visual cache. Controlled ablations attribute the gain to cross-layer sharing; refresh frequency, coefficient transport and causal feedback have no additional cost this sample resolves. All primary comparisons are paired, and negative results are reported.

open until 14 Dec 2026

est. 32% chance this paper gets accepted at ICLR 2027.

Reject 68%Accept 32%

What do you think this paper will get?

All positions stay anonymous.

Related papers

Loading the map…

Discussion (0)

Sign in to comment.