Multi-Dimensional Comparative Scale Construction for Efficient Personalized Subjective Judgment in High-Traffic Applications

Subjective judgments are central to many high-traffic applications, but subjective intensity is difficult to quantify and perceptions vary substantially across individuals. To address these challenges, we propose a pairwise comparative framework for multi-dimensional scale construction. By comparing case–person pairs along case and profile dimensions, the framework constructs relative scales that capture both fine-grained intensity and individual variation. To support practical high-traffic deployment, we optimize both offline scale construction and online inference. For scale construction, we combine sparse Elo comparisons with multi-judge voting, cutting the comparison cost from $O(N^2)$ to $O(NK)$ for $N$ objects and a budget of $K$ opponents per object, while limiting reliance on any single judge. For inference, we propose SubJudge, a System One model for personalized scoring with Batchwise Preference Optimization (BPO). Using Bradley–Terry comparisons, BPO trains the model to learn relative orderings, and SubJudge reads a continuous score from digit-token probabilities at the first response position, requiring only one forward pass per criterion and reducing the inference complexity to $O(1)$. Experiments on PluriHarms and iNews show that our 9B models match or surpass the evaluated frontier LLMs on multiple metrics. On the H100 GPU, SubJudge achieves an approximately $1.29\times$ to $261\times$ speedup in mean inference latency over Qwen3.5-9B with different thinking budgets.