From Objectives to What Models Learn: A Landau Theory of Invariant Learning

Invariant-learning objectives pursue similar goals yet produce qualitatively different regularization paths, leaving unclear when shortcuts can be suppressed without damaging stable modes. Our starting point is simple: in the desired shortcut-suppressed regime, shortcut loading is small, so the objective's low-order expansion governs local stability and residual amplitude. This brings the problem into the domain of Landau phase-transition theory. We establish a mathematical isomorphism between the near-critical normal form of predictive-mode learning and Landau theory, identifying the learning objective as an effective free energy and critical-mode amplitude as an order parameter. The resulting low-order objective signatures predict distinct regularization phenotypes: quadratic $R_2$ terms shift phase boundaries and enable finite-strength elimination, whereas quartic $R_4$ terms continuously attenuate acquired modes while leaving nonzero residual loading at finite strengths. Higher-order terms may further shape nonlinear tails. In a canonical bilinear model, we derive exact phase boundaries and equilibrium loadings, identifying conditions for a selective-retention window in which shortcut suppression preserves stable structure. Controlled bilinear and ReLU experiments, including an MNIST construction, support the predicted signature–phenotype relation, while coupled-feature experiments validate its extension to collective modes. The framework connects the mathematical structure of invariant-learning objectives to what models learn as regularization varies.