acceptodds
Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2027

Freeze or Dither: Rounding-Aware Precision Floors for Low-Precision Training

Abstract

Convergence theory for low-precision training has produced only upper bounds, in a worst-case relative-error model blind to the rounding rule. We give the first lower bounds for training with floating-point weight storage, organized by one principle: a coordinate survives round-to-nearest (RN) when its update magnitude either exceeds the local grid spacing or carries noise at that scale, and freezes or floors when it does neither — freeze or dither. Sign-type updates can never dither. Below an explicit threshold they freeze bitwise, weight growth stops at a hard “binade wall,” and their movement-weighted noisy floor is exactly under both RN and stochastic rounding (SR), for arbitrary predictable step-size schedules, so at the stationary floor SR provably cannot help sign descent. SGD self-dithers: RN's rounding bias collapses as , which puts homogeneous-noise SGD–RN on the universal scale. But un-ditherable low-noise coordinates escape the rescue, and under heterogeneous noise with a shared constant step SGD–RN floors at , strictly worse than SGD–SR, so no rounding-blind analysis can be tight for both rules. A representation floor separately forces mantissa bits; with the sufficiency of tang2026convergence the requirement is . The floors are measured to their constants, and the wall is visible in real training: in a M-parameter GPT-2 storing weights in bf16 with no master copy, RN pins every LayerNorm gain at exactly its initialization of (a binade boundary) in of (optimizer, seed) cells, SR pins none; at the tuned budget the held-out RN/SR ratios order, in every seed, as ditherability predicts, and SR recovers the fp32 master's loss at a third of the weight memory. All code, logs and figures behind every number reported here are in the supplementary material and will be released publicly upon acceptance.

open until 14 Dec 2026

est. 32% chance this paper gets accepted at ICLR 2027.

Reject 68%Accept 32%

What do you think this paper will get?

All positions stay anonymous.

Related papers

Loading the map…

Discussion (0)

Sign in to comment.