When Does Momentum Help in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards?

Momentum is a classical tool for accelerating convex optimization and a standard component of modern large language model training. Yet recent empirical work has questioned the usefulness of first-moment momentum in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). We study this question through a bandit formulation of RLVR with bias-corrected exponential moving average (EMA) momentum, where the EMA coefficient $\beta$ controls how quickly the weights on past gradients decay. When policy gradients are evaluated exactly, we prove that increasing $\beta$ within a range that prevents overshoot strictly accelerates optimization. When gradients are instead estimated from sampled responses, a positive expected gain can be obscured by sampling fluctuations. We show that as the learning rate $\eta$ decreases, the expected gain with fixed $\beta$ vanishes faster than these fluctuations, whereas increasing $\beta$ to keep $\eta /(1-\beta )$ within the safe regime preserves a nonvanishing gain that eventually dominates them. Bandit simulations quantitatively validate these predictions. RLVR experiments on Qwen3-4B-Base using SGD with EMA and AdamW support our principle of choosing larger coefficients in practical LLM post-training. On Qwen2.5-32B with AdamW, simply increasing ${\beta }_1$ improves mean validation accuracy by nearly $2$ percentage points over the conventional choice, demonstrating the principle's effectiveness at a larger model scale.